I was definitely hoping for more from him. His performance here comes across as forced and without spirit. What he did so well in Breaking Bad does not translate to Need for Speed. Thematically speaking, the Need for Speed movie is similar to Breaking Bad in that Paul undergoes terrible loss and is out for vengeance. Simply put, his performance did nothing for me. These scenes represent a bright spot for the film's writing and story, but they aren't enough to make up for its shortcomings. Without giving too much away, the movie presents a hilarious way to quit your job in your underwear (thank you, Rami Malek) and Scott "Kid Cudi" Mescudi steals the show with his frequently hilarious one-liners. There are some genuinely funny scenes in the movie, many of which come from Paul's group of car mechanic friends. It's a real shame the very talented Keaton is so unused in the movie. He's featured in a handful of scenes in the movie (probably shot in one day) and he's always sitting in this one room. He plays a wealthy and eccentric elite race organizer who never leaves his secret residence, communicating only through an advanced communications network. It's even more impressive when you consider Aaron Paul is behind the wheel for many of the scenes. Everything you see in the movie-explosions, cars driving off cliffs, hairpin turns at breakneck speeds-actually happened in the real world. Director Scott Waugh, who comes from an extensive stunt background (his father even played Spider-Man on the 1978 TV show The Amazing Spider-Man), said he did not want to lie to the audience using green screens, so he simply didn't. ![]() All the characters are completely one-dimensional and you'll cringe during a lot of the dialogue. It does not get more formulaic than this. It's the cliched and overdone narrative of a man framed for a crime he did not commit who sets out on a cross-country adventure seeking vengeance. I saw a screening of the film in Boston last month and what the 130-minute action flick boils down is this: it is full of hits and misses. Top Gun: Maverick hits theaters and IMAX on May 27.The Need for Speed movie is both great and terrible. Am I a Plane Guy now? I might be a Plane Guy. Even on the small screen, it looks quite grand. Cruise and director Joseph Kosinski ( Oblivion, Tron: Legacy) seemed to have a found a modern way to innovate on Tony Scott’s original Top Gun action by mounting cameras inside real planes and soaring them in every which way. ![]() ![]() I wanted to give you an experience of being inside that aircraft.” “Everything you see in this film is real,” Cruise said way back at the 2019 San Diego Comic-Con, where he premiered the first footage from the film. Maverick confronting his past, deepest fears, new enemies, yadda yadda, PLANES. Bradley Bradshaw (Miles Teller), aka “Rooster,” the son of Goose, who was killed during a training exercise in the original 1986 film. Top Gun: Maverick finds Cruise’s character Pete “Maverick” Mitchell graduating from rebel test pilot to instructor, leading a team of new TOPGUN hot shots in what a Paramount synopsis calls “a specialized mission the likes of which no living pilot has ever seen.” The new squad includes Lt. ![]() A new trailer teases the long-awaited sequel’s ground drama, and more importantly, the high-speed aerial stunts star Tom Cruise ( The Mummy) has cooked up for the film, which hits theaters this spring after many delays. But Top Gun: Maverick might just leave my head permanently in the clouds. Never been much of a Plane Guy - I leave that to Sir Charlie Hall, master of flight simulators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |